A focused forensic practice — seven disciplines, each retained on written engagement and delivered to evidentiary standards.
Tracing is reconstructive work. We follow the movement of fiat and digital assets across wallets, correspondent banks, exchanges, payment processors and intermediaries — preserving an evidentiary record at every step.
The output is a defensible map of who held an asset, when, and where it moved next. We rely on bank records, blockchain analytics, exchange disclosures and, where appropriate, court-obtained subpoenas. The chain is documented; nothing is asserted without source.
Analysis is interpretive work. Once movement is mapped, we examine pattern and structure: layering, structuring, churn, distribution behaviour. Activity is read against published typology rather than toward a desired conclusion.
The result is a written assessment that distinguishes legitimate flows from concealment behaviour, identifies likely intermediaries, and records the limits of what the available evidence can support.
Documentation is the deliverable your counsel can carry into proceedings. Every engagement produces a forensic narrative, a technical appendix and, where the matter requires, sworn declarations under penalty of perjury.
Reports are written for triers of fact: plain language in the body, methodology and source data in the appendix. Hash-verified evidence is preserved for chain of custody throughout.
Pseudonymous identifiers rarely tell a complete story. We work with disclosed exchange data, OSINT, corporate registry filings and sanctions sources to attribute wallets, accounts and shell entities to known counterparties.
Where disclosure requires legal process, we prepare the underlying records and coordinate with counsel — we do not represent clients in proceedings, and we do not guess at identity.
Where findings warrant escalation, we prepare and route briefings to law enforcement, regulators and foreign FIUs at counsel's direction. Disclosure is structured to be useful — concise, sourced and aligned to the receiving body's intake format.
This is not advocacy. We do not lobby outcomes, and we do not promise referrals will be acted on. We provide the record; the deciding body decides.
For matters in active litigation we serve as a forensic resource to retained counsel — preparing exhibits, responding to discovery, and supporting motion practice with reproducible data extracts.
Where the court requires it, lead investigators have provided expert declarations and depositions. Scope, fee and conflict checks are agreed in writing before any work begins.
Most matters begin here. A scoping review is a fixed-fee assessment of whether forensic work is viable, what disciplines apply, and what a fuller engagement would require in time and budget.
The deliverable is a short written opinion — honest about what can and cannot be reconstructed from the record as it stands. If the matter is not workable, we will say so in writing.
Initial conversations are private and without obligation. A senior investigator will read the intake and respond with a clear view of whether forensic work is viable.